NYSED redacts decisions, and its source files vary in quality. Gaps and text errors are original to the NYSED documents.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
187237,
Record Close date: May 11, 2020
Hearing Requested By: Parent
Date of Hearings: 10/21/19, 10/23/19, 11/22/19, 12/30, 2/6/20, 3/4/20 and 5/7/19
Hearing Officer: James McKeever, Esq.
APPEARANCESE::
For the Student:
ESQ., Attorney Student
For the Department of Education:
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
The parent filed the within DPC on September 4, 2019. I was appointed to this matter on September 9, 2019. The resolution period expired on October 4, 2019.
Compliance Date and Orders of Extension:
On one date the parties requested an extension of the compliance date, which included, but was not limited to, time to prepare for due process, witness availability, pursue possible settlement and to obtain the transcripts and close the record, inter alia. The Order of Extension will be submitted to the District with the certification of the record.
Findings of Fact:
The parent’s DPC requested funding for an Independent Neuropsychological evaluation at the AA1 rate, an increase of SETSS from 6 hours per week to 10 hours per week and home based ABA services. The parent withdrew the request for ABA services, without prejudice. The DOE did not object to the IEE and the increase in SETSS (Hearing date of May 7, 2020).
FAPE:
Two purposes of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482) are (1) to ensure that students with disabilities have available to them a FAPE that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living; and (2) to ensure that the rights of students with disabilities and parents of such students are protected (20 U.S.C. § 1400[d][1][A]-[B]; see generally Forest Grove v. T.A., 129 S. Ct. 2484, 2491 [2009]; Bd. of Educ. v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176, 206-07 [1982]). A FAPE is offered to a student when (a) the board of education complies with the procedural requirements set forth in the IDEA, and (b) the IEP developed by its CSE through the IDEA's procedures is reasonably calculated to enable the student to receive educational benefits (Rowley, 458 U.S. at 206-07; Cerra v. Pawling Cent. Sch. Dist., 427 F.3d 186, 192 [2d Cir. 2005]).
The DOE bears the burden of proof in due process hearings brought under the IDEA in New York State (See, N.Y. Educ. Law Section IEE:
Federal and State regulations provide that, subject to certain limitations, a parent has the right to an IEE at public expense if the parent disagrees with an evaluation obtained by the school district (34 C.F.R. § 300.502[a], [b]; 8 NYCRR 200.5[g][1]; see R.L. v. Plainville Bd. of Educ., 363 F. Supp. 2d. 222, 234-35 [D. Conn. 2005] [finding parental failure to disagree with an evaluation obtained by a public agency defeated a parent's claim for an IEE at public expense]). A parent, however, is only entitled to one IEE at public expense "each time the public agency conducts an evaluation with which the parent disagrees" (34 C.F.R. § 300.502[b][5]; 8 NYCRR 200.5[g][1]; see R.L., 363 F. Supp. 2d at 234-35). If a parent requests an IEE at public expense, the school district must, without unnecessary delay, ensure that either an IEE is provided at public expense or initiate an impartial hearing to show that its evaluation is appropriate or that the evaluation obtained by the parent does not meet the school district criteria (34 C.F.R. § 300.502[b][2][i][ii];5 8 NYCRR 200.5[g][1][iv]; see, e.g., A.S. v. Norwalk Bd. of Educ., 183 5 , Appeal No. 08-039; , Appeal No. 07-126; , Appeal No. 06-067; , Appeal No. 05-009; F. Supp. 2d 534, 549 [D. Conn. 2002] [upholding order of reimbursement where the district failed to demonstrate that its evaluation was appropriate]; Application of the Bd. of Educ., Appeal No. 09-109; Application of a Student with a Disability, Appeal No. 08-101). If a school district's evaluation is appropriate, a parent may not obtain an IEE at public expense (34 C.F.R. § 300.502[b][3]; 8 NYCRR 200.5[g][1][v].
Here, the evidence shows that the parent requested that the District fund an independent neuro-psychological evaluation. The District did not contest the parent’s request. Thus, I find that the parent is entitled to reimbursement and/or direct payment for the cost of the evaluation pursuant by way of an AA1 form from the DOE.
The parent also alleged that the DOE failed to offer a FAPE during the subject school year when the DOE reduced the student’s SETSS from 10 hours per week to 6 hours per week. The DOE did not contest the parent’s assertion. As such, the DOE shall also increase the student’s SETSS to 10 hours per week.
ORDERED
(1) The DOE shall reimburse the parent and/or directly pay for the cost of a private Neuro-psychological evaluation.
(2) The DOE shall provide the student with 10 hours of SETSS per week.
(3) The parent’s claim for ABA services is withdrawn without prejudice.
Dated: New York, New York
May 11, 2020
James McKeever
James McKeever, Esq.
Impartial Hearing Officer
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Within 40 days of the date of this decision, the parent and/or the Public School District has a right to appeal the decision to a State Review Officer (SRO) of the New York State Education Department under section 4404 of the Education Law and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
If either party plans to appeal the decision, a notice of intention to seek review shall be personally served upon the opposing party no later than 25 days after the date of the decision sought to be reviewed.
An appealing party's request for review shall be personally served upon the opposing party within 40 days from the date of the decision sought to be reviewed. An appealing party shall file the notice of intention to seek review, notice of request for review, request for review, and proof of service with the Office of State Review of the State Education Department within two days after service of the request for review is complete. The rules of procedure for appeals before an SRO are found in Part 279 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. A copy of the rules in Part 279 and model forms are available at http://www.sro.nysed.gov.