UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, in ) their own capacity and as parent ) of CHILD DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, ) 2:22-cv-55 in her own capacity and as parent ) of CHILD DOE 2 and CHILD ) DOE 3, and JANE DOE 3, in her own ) Judge Marilyn J. Horan capacity and as parent of CHILD ) DOE 4 and on behalf of those ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL ) DISTRICT, a Pennsylvania ) governmental entity, RICHARD ) MCCLURE, ELIZABETH ) BLACKBURN, MARCIE CROW, ) LESLIE BRITTON DOZIER, ) PAIGE HARDY, KEVIN MAHLER, ) VIDYA SZYMKOWIAK, ) ELIZABETH WERNER, SHANNON ) YEAKEL, all individual elected officials ) sued in their individual capacity and in ) their capacity as members of the NORTH ) ALLEGHENY SCHOOL DISTRICT ) BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ) a Pennsylvania elected legislative body, ) and NORTH ALLEGHENY SCHOOL ) DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ) a Pennsylvania elected legislative body, ) ) Defendants. )
ORDER OF THE COURT
AND NOW this 1st day of February 2022, the Court hereby grants, to the extent provided
for herein, Defendants’ Motion to Amended this Court’s January 17, 2022 Temporary
Restraining Order (ECF No. 21). In their Motion, Defendants requested leave for certification of
interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). Defendants’ Motion comes after another
case in this District, Doe 1 v. Upper Saint Clair School District, Civ. Action No. 2:22-cv-112,
1
considered similar issues albeit under different facts. The District Court in that case denied
Plaintiffs’ TRO, which has been appealed to the Third Circuit. 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) allows a
district court to certify a motion for interlocutory appeal, when the judge is of the “opinion that
such order involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for
difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the
ultimate termination of the litigation.” The issue has been briefed by both sides, and Defendants’
Motion is granted as follows:
With regard to the issues of standing and administrative exhaustion, the Court grants
Defendants’ request for certification of interlocutory appeal. Determination of the issues of
standing and exhaustion of administrative remedies for immunocompromised students in the
District, who are seeking relief under the ADA and Section 504 when the universal mask
mandate has been lifted and when the community transmission rate is in a category of “high,”
impacts the termination of the case and involves controlling questions of law. 1
With regard to questions of whether virtual learning is a reasonable accommodation
under the ADA and Section 504, and whether plaintiffs can satisfy the elements for injunctive
relief under the ADA and Section 504, the Court is of the opinion that the record in this case is
not sufficiently developed. As such, said questions are not ripe for an interlocutory appeal under
28 U.S.C. 1292(b).
1 In this Court’s TRO determination as regards administrative exhaustion, it reasoned that under Fry v. Napoleon Cmty. Sch., 137 S. Ct. 743, 755 (2017), administrative exhaustion was not necessary given that this was an access issue under the ADA and Section 504 rather than a FAPE issue. However, should the Circuit deem administrative exhaustion necessary under these circumstances, the Court would highlight that it had received some facts at the TRO stage that Plaintiff John Doe 1 had requested an accommodation on December 10, 2022 regarding masking but at the time the TRO was filed, Plaintiff Doe 1 had received no response from the District. (ECF No. 4, at 12). This Court had not yet had the opportunity to receive any additional evidence regarding those facts. 2
As such, the Court grants Defendants’ Motion for Interlocutory Appeal with regard to the
following two questions:
(1) Do immunocompromised students have standing to bring ADA and Section 504
claims when a school district’s universal mask mandate has been lifted and
community transmission rates are in a category of “high”?; and
(2) Are immunocompromised students required to exhaust administrative remedies under
the ADA and Section 504 when a school district’s universal mask mandate has been
lifted and community transmission rates are in a category of “high”?
The Court will immediately notify the Clerk of the Third Circuit of the entry of this
Order.
Marilyn J. Horan United States District Judge
3