IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
: CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiffs, : NO. 13-4654
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2015, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
(1) Plaintiffs’ Motions for Judgment on the
Supplemented Administrative Record (ECF Nos. 29
38) are GRANTED as to the Pennsylvania Special
Education Hearing Officer’s ruling on interim
pendency and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer’s
ruling on the adequacy of the individualized
education program (“IEP”);
(2) Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the
Administrative Record (ECF No. 31) is GRANTED as
to the Hearing Officer’s ruling on the adequacy
of the IEP and DENIED as to the Hearing Officer’s 2
ruling on interim pendency; and
(3) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is
GRANTED
(4) The Court will separately schedule an evidentiary
hearing to determine the amount of reimbursement
to which Plaintiffs are entitled on their
pendency claim. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
3
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J