Skip to main content
Special Education Law
Sign In

Centennial School District v. L. et al.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CENTENNIAL SCHOOL CIVIL ACTION DISTRICT, NO. 08-982

Plaintiff, PHIL L. and LORI L. ex. reI. MATTHEW L.,

Defendants.

o R D E R

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2011, for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the cross motions for judgment on the administrative record and/or summary judgment (docs. no. 68 & 70.) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

The Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's request that the Court vacate the decisions of Hearing Officer Bateman and Hearing Officer Carroll insofar as they found that Matthew was § 504 eligible from mid-January 2007 to the end of the 2007 2008 school year.

The Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to Defendants' request that the Court affirm Hearing Officer Bateman's decision insofar as he found that Matthew was § 504 from February 2006 to mid-January 2007.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the case is REMANDED to the Hearing Officer for findings of fact and conclusions of law as to 2 whether Matthew was denied a FAPE from February 2006 to mid- January 2007 and, if so, what amount of compensatory education is appropriate.

(1-'L ~. ~"-",,,,,--

.,/ EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 3