Skip to main content
Special Education Law
Sign In

Riley et al v. School Administrative Unit #23 et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Jamie Riley, et al.

Civil No. 15-cv-152-SM School Administrative Unit #23, et al.

O R D E R

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated December 22, 2015, for the reasons set forth therein. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction is hereby denied. 2

SO ORDERED.

Date: January 14, 2016 cc: Kirk C. Simoneau, Esq.

Melissa A. Hewey, Esq.

Dona Feeney, Esq.

Jeanne M. Kincaid, Esq. 3

D.N.H.: Riley et al v. School... | Special Education Law