M. et al v. KING PHILIP REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ORDER

March 31, 2011

TAURO, J.

For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment [#24] is DENIED and Defendant King Philip’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment [#35] is ALLOWED. Defendant DESE relied on the arguments made by King Philip^[1] and summary judgment is thus granted as against both Defendants.^[2] This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Joseph L. Tauro

United States District Judge

2

---

Footnotes

[1] Mot. Hr’g Tr., 29 [#42].

[2] To the extent that Defendant DESE did not move for summary judgment, this court grants summary judgment in its favor independently of a motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)(1).