Skip to main content
Special Education Law
DECISIONDismissedCT SDE Case No. 16-0628

Student v. Darien Board of Education

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Student v. Darien Board of Education - CT SDE Case No. 16-0628

Case No. 16-0628

Student v. Darien Board of Education

Appearing on behalf of the Parent: Attorney Lawrence Berliner Law Office of Lawrence Berliner, LLC 1720 Post Road, Ste. 214E Westport, CT 068801

Appearing on behalf of the Board: Attorney Andreana Bellach Shipman & Goodwin, LLP 300 Atlantic Avenue Stamford, CT 06901

Appearing before: Justino Rosado, Esq., Hearing Officer

ISSUES:

1. Was the program offered by the Board for the 2016-2017 school year appropriate and does it provide the Student with a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) in the least restrictive environment

- (LRE)? If not;

2. Does the program at Eagle Hill provide the Student with FAPE in the LRE?

3. Should the Board be responsible for the cost of the program at Eagle Hill for the 2016-2017 school year?

4. Does the Student require an extended school year (ESY) for the summer of 2016?

5. Should the Board be responsible for the cost of the ESY program at Eagle Hill for the summer of 2016?

6. Is the Student entitled for compensatory education for the denial of FAPE?

SUMMARY AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

The Student has been identified with Specific Learning Disabilities and is entitled to receive FAPE as defined in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA) 20 U.S.C. §1401 et seq. and Connecticut General Statute §10-76a et seq. At a planning and placement team (PPT) meeting, the Parents requested that the Student be placed at Eagle Hill for the 2016-2017 school year. The Board denied the Parents’ request. On June 21, 2016, the Board received notice of the Parents’ request for due process. An f impartial hearing officer was appointed on June 22, 2016 and a pre-hearing conference was held on July 1, 2016. The parties agreed to a resolution meeting. An October 5, 2016 hearing date was chosen by the patties. In an electronic transmission the parties advised the hearing officer that the matter had been resolved and requested cancelation of the hearing date. The hearing date was cancelled and the Parents’ attorney withdrew the matter with prejudice. The mailing date of the Final decision and Order was extended to accommodate the hearing date. The date for the mailing of the Final Decision and Order is October 7, 2016.

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER:

THE MATTER IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.