IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
G.L. by and through his parents, S.H. and K.L.; : CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiffs, : NO. 15-6425 __________________________________________:
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2017, upon consideration of the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Dkt. No. 15) filed on July 29, 2016; the Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (Dkt. No. 16) also filed on July 29, 2016; Defendant’s Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion (Dkt. No. 17) filed on August 18, 2016; Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Response to Defendant’s Motion (Dkt. No. 18) filed on August 19, 2016; and for the reasons expressed in the foregoing Memorandum Opinion,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion (Docket No. 15) is DENIED and Defendant’s Motion (Dkt. No. 16) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs and the Clerk of Court shall close this case statistically.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Henry S. Perkin
HENRY S. PERKIN,
2