Skip to main content
Special Education Law
Sign In

H.G. v. Upper Dublin School District

IN THE UNITED STATES ,!ISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRIC OF PENNSYLVANIA 1

H.G., a minor, by and through his parent 1 IVIL ACTION and natural guardian, BARBARA DAVIS

o. 13-1976

1

Plaintiff UPPER DUBLIN SCHOOL DISTRICT

I

Defendant

I

ORD Er

AND NOW, this 17"' day of April 2015, up1l careful and independent consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Mtistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, [ECF 37], Plaintiffs Objections thereto, [ECF 38], Defendantls response to Plaintiffs Objections, [ECF 39], and the administrative record, and consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion

! filed on this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: I

1. Plaintiffs Objections are OVERRULfD, in part.

2. The Report and Recommendation is ArPROVED and ADOPTED

2. Plaintiffs amended motion to receivl additional evidence, [ECF 36], is

GRANTED, in part, to permit the Jidmission of portions of Plaintiffs

Exhibit 5, [ECF 25-8], and the entiret'I of Exhibits 9, 10, 19, and 22, [ECF

26-3, 26-4, 27-3, 27-4, 27-7], and DENlIED as to all other submissions.

1

3. Defendant's submission of Exhibit 17,j [ECF 24-19], is DENIED.

2. Plaintiffs motion for judgment on thlll administrative record, [ECF 25], is

DENIED. I

3. Defendant's motion for judgment on he administrative record, [ECF 24],

1

is GRANTED. .

I

The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this m~tter CLOSED.

2

I BYTH COURT:

E.D. Pa.: H.G. v. Upper Dublin... | Special Education Law