Skip to main content
Special Education Law
Sign In

Reyes v. Board of Education of the Bellmore & Merrick School District

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------X JOY REYES,

Plaintiff, ORDER -against- 14-CV-0661(JS)(GRB)

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE BELLMORE & MERRICK SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant. ----------------------------------X APPEARANCES For Plaintiff: Joy Reyes, pro se P.O. Box 550 Merrick, NY 11566

For Defendant: No appearance

SEYBERT, District Judge:

By Memorandum and Order dated March 24, 2014, the Court

dismissed the Complaint brought by Ellen Reyes (“Reyes”), as parent

and natural guardian of Joy Reyes (“Plaintiff”), without prejudice

and with leave to file an amended complaint. (See March 24, 2014

Mem. & Order, Seybert, D.J.) Because Reyes, a non-attorney parent,

cannot represent her adult daughter in this case, Reyes and

Plaintiff were advised that in order to proceed with their claims,

brought pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education

Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et. seq., (“IDEA”), against the Board of

Education of the Bellmore and Merrick School District

(“Defendant”), Plaintiff must complete and file her own application

to proceed in forma pauperis.1 (See March 24, 2014 Mem. & Order,

1 The Court granted Reyes’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in the March 24, 2014 Memorandum and Order.

Seybert, D.J. at 7.) On April 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed an Amended

Complaint naming herself as the sole Plaintiff but did not file an

application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiff

is directed to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis

within two (2) weeks from the date of this Order in order to

proceed with her case. Plaintiff’s failure to do so within the

time allowed will lead to the dismissal of her claims without

prejudice.

The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3)

that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith

and therefore in forma pauperis status is DENIED for the purpose of

any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45,

82 S. Ct. 917, 8 L. Ed. 2d 21 (1962).

The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of the

Memorandum and Order to the pro se Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ JOANNA SEYBERT Joanna Seybert, U.S.D.J.

Dated: May 19 , 2014 Central Islip, NY

2

E.D.N.Y.: Reyes v. Board of... | Special Education Law