Skip to main content
Special Education Law
DECISIONDismissedCT SDE Case No. 19-0019

Student v. Darien Board of Education

STATE OF CONNECTICUT

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

Student v. Darien Board of Education - CT SDE Case No. 19-0019

Case No. 19-0019

Student v. Darien Board of Education

Appearing on behalf of the Student: Attorney Piper Paul Law Office of Piper Paul, LLC 1465 Post Road East, 1st Floor Westport CT 06880

Appearing on behalf of the Board: Attorney Andreana R. Bellach Shipman & Goodwin LLC 300 Atlantic Street, 3rd Floor Stamford, CT 06901

Appearing before: Attorney Ann F. Bird Hearing Officer

ISSUES:

1. Did the Board of Education provide FAPE for the 2016-17 and/or the 2017-18 School Years?

a. If not, is the Windward School appropriate for the Student?

b. If the Board of Education did not provide FAPE for the Student 2016-17 and/or the 2017-18 School Years and the Windward School is appropriate for the Student, should the Student be placed at the Windward School for two years as compensatory education due to the Board’s failure to provide FAPE?

2. Does the program proposed by the Board for the 2018-19 provide FAPE?

a. If the program proposed by the Board for the 2018-19 does not provide FAPE, is the Windward School appropriate for the Student in the least restrictive environment?

b. If the program proposed by the Board for the 2018-19 does not provide FAPE and the Windward School is appropriate for the Student in the least restrictive environment, should the Student be placed at the Windward School for the 2018-19 School Year?

PROCEDURAL HISTORY:

The Student initiated this special education due process case on August 13, 2018. This Impartial Hearing Officer was assigned to the case on August 14, 2018. A Prehearing Conference was scheduled for September 5, 2018 but neither party appeared. Attorney Paul, representing the Student, then reported that the matter had been resolved at mediation but that an agreement had not been executed. Both counsel were advised that they would have until September 25 to request dismissal with prejudice.

Neither counsel has reported as to the status of the matter or requested that the prehearing conference be reconvened as of noon on September 28, 2018.

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER:

1. The matter has not been prosecuted by the Student.

2. This matter is dismissed for lack of prosecution.